Microsoft have been adding quite a lot of new functionality to Microsoft Dynamics in recent versions, but the sample data has not been getting updated.
To remedy this, Terry Heley on the Dynamics GP Support and Services Blog has shared some macros, for Dynamics GP 2016, which add sample data into the Fabrikam sample data.
The new sample data focuses on a few modules:
- Advanced Human Resources
- Analytical Accounting
- Workflow for HRP
- Project Accounting Time and Expense
- PTO Manager
- Employee Self Service
Terry points out that this is a run at your own risk macro built on GP 2016, although it would probably be usable on Dynamics GP 2015 as well.
There are instruction documents with each macro as macros can crash based on the menu bar selected in user Preferences.
Also note that there is no support for these macros so no cases can be logged if issues are found.
The download link is available at the end of the post.
While implementing Microsoft Dynamics GP for a client earlier this year, we used macros to load Assembly Transactions into Dynamics GP as there is no integration available in Integration Manager. The macros were created on the clients development server, tested and then migrated to the live server.
However, despite the development and live servers having exactly the same Windows and Dynamics GP configurations, the following error was generated on the live server when trying to run the macro:
Microsoft Dynamics GP
Keyword or punctuation expected, but not found. (Line #2)
# DEXVERSION=11.00.0359.000 2 2
CheckActiveWin dictionary 'default' form bmTrxEntry window bmTrxEntry
TypeTo field 'TRX ID' , '262307A'
MoveTo field 'TRX Date'
The code displayed above is from the macro file; the problem was the key words (such as dictionary) were not capitalised when the macro was recorded and tested on the development server, but needed to be capitalised for the live server. To get the capitalisation correct, I recorded a macro on live and then used the source CSV file to create a new macro by using the newly recorded one as a template for the mail merge.
It did mean that this was not tested the way the previous one was, but we’d proved the method on test and this was deemed acceptable.